After a First Irish "No"
Janis A. Emmanouilidis
Comment
Athens 06/2008
After a First Irish „No“
(published on June 10, 2008)
On June 12, 2008 Ireland will hold an obligatory referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon. The result of the popular vote is open. Latest polls suggest that the “yes” campaign is leading, but the race is too close to call. Many voters are still undecided and the perspective of a potential low turnout threatens a positive outcome of the referendum. Three years after the French and the Dutch “no” to the European Constitution, the fate of yet another European treaty is at stake.
But what would happen in case the Irish voters reject the Lisbon Treaty? Most commentators argue that an Irish “no” in June 2008 would kill off the new Treaty. Their argument runs as follows: The Irish cannot be asked to hold a re-vote on the Lisbon Treaty – as they did in 2001/02 when the referendum on the Nice Treaty had failed in the first round. This time the Irish would follow the French and Dutch example, who after their “no” to the European Constitution in May/June 2005 had opted against a second popular vote. In this case, another ratification process would have failed. The Lisbon Treaty could not enter into force. The EU 27+ would have to continue to operate on the basis of the ill-suited Nice Treaties.
But is this scenario really the only option? No! The Irish case is different from the French and Dutch three years ago. Leaving Ireland aside, chances are very high that the Lisbon Treaty can be ratified by all other 26 EU countries – provided that the ratification process continues. 18 member states have already ratified the Union’s new primary law and others are well on track. Among them also doubtful cases like the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Poland or the United Kingdom.
In 2005 the picture was different: Yes, the French and the Dutch were
the ones that had actually voted against the Constitutional Treaty. But
if the ratification process had continued at the time, other EU members
would have followed their example. The European Union would have found
itself in a total mess. This time things are different. If the
remaining EU countries stay on track and continue their national
ratification processes, chances are high that Ireland will be the only
one that will have rejected the Lisbon Treaty. In this case, the other
26 EU members representing nearly 490 million people and thus 99 per
cent (!) of the Union’s total population would have every moral right
to ask their Irish fellow European citizens to reconsider their “no”
vote in late 2008 or 2009.
In a first step, the Heads of State and
Government should at their summit meeting a week after the Irish
referendum send out a strong signal. They should firmly declare that
they respect the Irish vote, but that the ratification process in the
other EU members will continue in spite of the original Irish “no”. But
before that, let us all cross fingers that the Irish will vote “yes”
for the Lisbon Treaty already on June 12, so that we are spared from
yet another European crisis.
The text can also be found under blogs@eliamep
Latest publications
Europe’s next watershed – how liberal Europe should react to Trump 2.0
Janis A. Emmanouilidis & Fabian Zuleeg, EPC Discussion Paper, Brussels 01/2025
Overcoming a hollow & illusory unity – Preparing EUrope for Trump
Janis A. Emmanouilidis | Almut Möller | Fabian Zuleeg, EPC Commentary, Brussels 11/2024
Reactions to the next Commission
Fabian Zuleeg & Janis A. Emmanouilidis, EPC Flash Analysis, Brussels 09/2024
Confronting the permacrisis: Time for a supra-governmental avantgarde
Fabian Zuleeg, Almut Möller, Janis A. Emmanouilidis, EPC Discussion Paper, Brussels 07/2024
Eight structural innovations for the EU’s next politico-institutional cycle
Janis A. Emmanouilidis and Fabian Zuleeg, EPC Discussion Paper, Brussels 06/2024
Participatory democracy at the EU level: How to break the invisible ceiling?
Janis A. Emmanouilidis and Corina Stratulat, Observatory Report, EPC & EU Democracy Reform Observatory 03/2024
Europawahl 2024 – was für die EU und Deutschland auf dem Spiel steht
Janis A. Emmanouilidis and Johannes Greubel, Brussels 01/2024
Turning Fear Into Hope
Herman Van Rompuy | Fabian Zuleeg | Janis A. Emmanouilidis | Jacki Davis, EPC 11/2022
Overcoming the ambition-unity dilemma
Janis A. Emmanouilidis and Fabian Zuleeg, Brussels 10/2022
The Future is Now – What next after the Conference on the Future of Europe?
Janis A. Emmanouilidis, Taking Stock, Moving Forward: Reflections Following the Conference on the Future of Europe, Hanns Seidel Foundation & ELIAMEP, Athens 08/2022